The decision by Western countries to send tanks to Ukraine is a welcome one, but tanks-at least in their current numbers-will not change the course of the war. For Western tanks to affect the war’s outcome, the West needs to send more of them, Ukraine needs to use them as part of a combined arms team, and it must develop the capability to logistically support them.Russia will struggle to upgrade its own tank contingent in Ukraine to offset the new capability Western tanks will provide. The decision by Western governments to send tanks-the premier ground offensive weapon of modern armies-represents greater Western confidence in Ukraine.Although Western tanks are qualitatively superior to Russian tanks fighting in Ukraine, they will only affect the outcome of the war if they arrive in sufficient numbers, are used effectively, and are supported properly.And while it’s clear that the tank must evolve to survive against modern weapons, it’s unclear what, exactly, the tanks of the future might look like - and what next-generation weapons they might need to punch through enemy defenses. Ultimately, one of the major lessons from the Ukraine war may end up being not just that the tank is far from dead, but that it needs a lot more protection to avoid becoming too big and vulnerable to survive modern wars, like the battleship. We ensure that our leaders and soldiers understand how to fight as a combined arms and joint team, as well as the need to present multiple dilemmas to our enemies at echelon.” “These wars continue to reinforce the importance of combined arms maneuver and the need for joint operations to set conditions for tactical engagements. “When it comes to training, we continue to modify instruction at every echelon as we learn from the conflicts in Nagorno Karabakh and Ukraine,” Harshbarger said.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |